Ubicación: Global + English
Global Global Algérie Français Algeria English Angola Português Angola English Argentina Español Argentina English Australia English Austria Deutsch Austria English Azerbaijan English Azerbaijan Русский Bahrain English Bangladesh English Belgium English Belgium Français Belgium Nederlands Brazil Português Brazil English Bulgaria български Bulgaria English Cameroon English Cameroon Français Canada English Canada Français Chile Español Chile English China 中文 China 日本語 China English Colombia Español Colombia English Croatia English Czech Republic Čeština Czech Republic English Denmark English Djibouti English Ecuador Español Ecuador English Egypt English Estonia English Ethiopia English Finland Suomi Finland English France Français France English Georgia English Georgia Русский Germany Deutsch Germany English Ghana English Greece Ελληνικά Greece English Guatemala Español Guatemala English Hong Kong, China English Hong Kong, China 中文 Hungary Magyar Hungary English India English Indonesia English Iraq English Ireland English Italy Italiano Italy English Ivory Coast Français Ivory Coast English Japan 日本語 Japan English Jordan English Kazakhstan Русский Kazakhstan English Kenya English Kuwait English Kyrgyzstan Русский Kyrgyzstan English Latvia English Lithuania English Malaysia English Mauritius English Mauritius français (Maurice) Mexico Español Mexico English Moldova Română Moldova English Mongolia English Morocco English Morocco Français Mozambique Português Mozambique English Netherlands Nederlands Netherlands English New Zealand English Nigeria English Norway English Oman English Pakistan English Paraguay Español Paraguay English Peru Español Peru English Philippines English Poland Polski Poland English Portugal Português Portugal English Qatar English Republic of Korea 한국어 Republic of Korea English Romania Română Romania English Saudi Arabia English Serbia Српски Serbia English Singapore English Slovakia English Slovenia English South Africa English Spain English Spain Español Sri Lanka English Sweden English Switzerland Deutsch Switzerland Français Switzerland Italiano Switzerland English Tanzania English Thailand ไทย Thailand English Togo English Togo Français Tunisia English Tunisia Français Türkiye Türkçe Türkiye English Turkmenistan Русский Turkmenistan English Ukraine Українська Ukraine English United Arab Emirates English United Kingdom English Uruguay Español Uruguay English USA English Uzbekistan English Uzbekistan Русский Vietnam Tiếng Việt Vietnam English

Detection Method for Settling Bacteria Count in SPF Animal Facilities: A Complete Technical Guide

The settling bacteria count test is a critical microbiological monitoring method used to verify air hygiene in SPF (Specific Pathogen Free) laboratory animal facilities. This guide explains the detection principle, sampling procedures, incubation conditions, acceptance criteria, and quality control requirements for evaluating airborne microbial contamination in barrier environments. It is an essential reference for laboratory animal facility managers, quality assurance personnel, and testing professionals.

SPF

Technical Overview

SPF (Specific Pathogen Free) animal facilities are barrier-controlled environments in which laboratory animals are maintained free of a defined list of pathogenic microorganisms. Because airborne microbial contamination directly threatens the microbiological status of the animal colony, routine environmental monitoring is mandatory. The settling bacteria count test (also known as the falling bacteria count or settle plate method) is the most widely used technique for this purpose.

The method is based on passive air sampling by gravitational sedimentation. Sterile nutrient agar plates are exposed to the ambient air of the facility for a defined period, during which microbe-carrying particles deposit onto the agar surface. After incubation, visible colonies develop, and the colony count per plate (CFU/plate) reflects the microbial load of the air at the sampling location.

In China, the applicable standards include GB 14925 (Laboratory Animal—Requirements of Environment and Housing Facilities) and GB 50447-2008 (Architectural and Technical Code for Laboratory Animal Facilities). For barrier environments housing SPF animals, the static acceptance criterion is typically no more than 3 CFU per 90 mm plate exposed for 30 minutes, while isolator environments require no detectable colonies. Internationally, ISO 14698-1 provides the general framework for biocontamination control of controlled environments and can be referenced when establishing monitoring programs.

Testing Samples

Barrier Housing Rooms

Primary sampling targets include mouse and rat breeding rooms, experimental holding rooms, and procedure rooms located inside the SPF barrier. These areas represent the core animal environment where microbiological control must be demonstrated. Samples are collected at working height, typically 0.8 to 1.5 meters above the floor, corresponding to the level of cage racks and working surfaces.

Auxiliary Functional Areas

Ancillary zones within or adjacent to the barrier, such as clean corridors, dressing rooms, transfer chambers, and cleaning areas, may also be sampled. These locations help identify potential contamination sources and verify that the pressure cascade and personnel flow are functioning as designed.

Isolators and Ventilated Cage Systems

For isolator-maintained colonies, settle plates can be placed inside the isolator chamber through glove ports. For individually ventilated cage (IVC) systems, sampling is generally performed in the room housing the racks, while additional cage-level evaluation may be performed as part of comprehensive microbiological monitoring programs.

Testing Items

The core testing item is the total aerobic bacterial settling count, expressed as CFU per plate for a 30-minute exposure. Depending on the monitoring program, supplementary items may include:

  • Total fungal settling count using Sabouraud dextrose agar plates incubated at 20 to 25 degrees Celsius for 5 to 7 days
  • Concurrent recording of environmental parameters, including temperature, relative humidity, pressure differentials, air change rate, and HEPA filtration status
  • Identification of representative colonies when counts approach or exceed limits, in order to trace contamination sources

Testing Methods

Equipment and Materials

The test requires 90 mm tryptone soy agar (TSA) or nutrient agar plates prepared under aseptic conditions, a calibrated bacteriological incubator, timers, sterile transport containers, labels, and recording forms. All personnel entering the barrier must follow the full gowning and disinfection procedures defined in the facility SOP.

Pre-Test Preparation

Before sampling, verify the following conditions:

  • The HVAC and air purification system has been running continuously for the period specified in the SOP, commonly at least 24 hours, to ensure stabilized air cleanliness
  • Media quality control has been completed, including sterility checks on sample lots and growth promotion testing with reference strains such as Staphylococcus aureus or Bacillus subtilis
  • For static testing, the facility has been cleaned and disinfected according to SOP, with no animals or personnel present other than the sampling operators
  • For dynamic testing, the facility is operating under normal working conditions with animals and routine activities in progress

Plate Exposure Procedure

Sampling points are arranged to represent the room evenly. A typical layout uses at least five points, consisting of the room center and four positions near the corners, all located at least one meter from walls and away from the direct discharge jets of supply diffusers. At each point, the operator removes the plate lid, places it face down beside the plate, and exposes the agar surface upward for exactly 30 minutes. All plates in a room should be opened and closed simultaneously to capture a uniform environmental condition. During exposure, personnel must remain still and avoid talking, coughing, or walking above the plates. After exposure, plates are closed, inverted, labeled with location and time, and transferred to the incubator in sterile containers.

Incubation and Colony Counting

Exposed plates are inverted and incubated at 30 to 35 degrees Celsius for 48 to 72 hours. Fungal plates, if included, are incubated at 20 to 25 degrees Celsius for 5 to 7 days. After incubation, colonies are counted using a colony counter or manual counting with a magnifier, and results are recorded for each plate. Media blank plates and unexposed field control plates must show no growth for the test to be considered valid.

Calculation and Interpretation

Results are reported directly as CFU per plate per 30 minutes and compared against the applicable acceptance criteria:

  • Barrier environment (SPF): no more than 3 CFU per plate under static conditions
  • Isolator environment: no colonies detected
  • Conventional environment: no more than 10 to 30 CFU per plate depending on the applicable standard edition

Where an airborne concentration is required, the Omeliansky conversion formula may be applied: CFU per cubic meter equals 50,000 multiplied by the colony count, divided by the product of plate area in square centimeters and exposure time in minutes. For a standard 90 mm plate exposed for 30 minutes, this yields an approximate conversion factor of 26 times the colony count. Any plate exceeding the limit triggers an investigation, corrective disinfection, and confirmatory retesting.

Quality Control Measures

Reliable results depend on strict quality control, including:

  • Regular calibration and performance verification of incubators and timers
  • Growth promotion testing of each media lot against qualified reference strains
  • Inclusion of negative media controls and unexposed field controls in every testing round
  • Systematic training and competency assessment of sampling personnel
  • Complete documentation of sampling conditions, plate traceability, and chain of custody

Applications

Settling bacteria count detection is applied across the full lifecycle of SPF animal facilities:

  • Routine environmental monitoring of rodent breeding and experimental barrier facilities at monthly or quarterly intervals defined by the facility SOP
  • Commissioning and performance validation of newly built or renovated facilities before animals are introduced
  • Verification of disinfection effectiveness following terminal cleaning, fogging, or vaporized hydrogen peroxide decontamination cycles
  • Support for laboratory animal facility licensing, accreditation audits, and third-party inspection
  • Investigation of suspected contamination events in breeding colonies or experimental studies
  • Quality assurance at research institutions, contract research organizations (CROs), pharmaceutical companies, and university animal centers

FAQ

Q: How often should settling bacteria testing be performed in an SPF facility?

A: Most facilities test monthly or quarterly according to their SOP. Additional testing is required during commissioning, after major HVAC maintenance or filter replacement, after deep disinfection, and following any suspected contamination incident.

Q: Why is a 30-minute exposure period used?

A: The 30-minute exposure is specified in national standards such as GB 14925 and GB 50447, ensuring results are comparable between tests and consistent with published acceptance limits of 3 CFU per plate for barrier environments.

Q: What is the difference between static and dynamic testing?

A: Static testing is performed in a disinfected, animal-free facility and verifies the cleanliness of the physical environment and engineering systems. Dynamic testing is performed during normal operation with animals and personnel present and reflects real working conditions. Barrier facilities are commonly qualified under static conditions and monitored dynamically thereafter.

Q: What should be done if results exceed the acceptance limit?

A: An investigation should be launched covering disinfection procedures, HEPA filter integrity, pressure differentials, airflow patterns, and personnel practices. The affected area is re-cleaned and re-disinfected, followed by confirmatory retesting. Colony identification may help trace the contamination source. If exceedances persist, comprehensive engineering review is warranted.

Q: How does the settle plate method compare with active air sampling?

A: Settle plates are simple, inexpensive, and directly reflect microbial deposition onto exposed surfaces, including animals, feed, and equipment. Active air samplers quantify airborne concentrations in CFU per cubic meter and capture smaller particles more efficiently. The two methods are complementary, and comprehensive programs often combine them.

Q: Which agar medium should be used?

A: Tryptone soy agar (TSA) or standard nutrient agar is used for total aerobic bacterial counts. Sabouraud dextrose agar may be used in parallel when fungal monitoring is required.

Why Choose ZKGX?

  • State-of-the-art analytical equipment
  • Highly qualified scientific team
  • Fast turnaround time
  • Competitive pricing